ITT: subtle details we rarely get in animation anymore

ITT: subtle details we rarely get in animation anymore

Attached: darkwing-duck-gosalyn-mallard2.gif (498x280, 2.99M)

Yeah you're right, I didn't even know that her buttfeathers clip right through her shirt, more of an oversight than a subtle detail though.

Oh you know jannies, they don't like anything that isn't a Twitter screencap thread or a contemporary animation circlejerk.

Because duck pedos like you are disgusting.

And? We were having civil conversation either way.

Where do you think we are?

Any Forums doesn't stand for "I Like to Fuck Ducks", user.

So why do so many cartoon and comic creators sexualize animals so often?

fifth post best post

It should.

Attached: 1552053478902.jpg (481x476, 94.13K)

Based April, May and June.

I should draw Gosalyn sometime, she's cute.

Attached: 1449532757908.jpg (768x576, 55.57K)

I'd recommend it.

I could see her taunting someone with her rear, something cute like that.

Based.

Attached: Daddy's Little Whore.png (1200x942, 661.81K)

>using an idea from the last thread
Basado

>someone
Honker. Or her dad.

Based trips

Attached: checked~2.jpg (901x1047, 385.95K)

>the heel of her shoe squishing into her bum
Fantastic attention to detail, there. I wonder what was going through their minds when putting the pen to paper.

She looks she has a lot of fun with her dad.

Attached: mplayer_snapshot_2022-02-09 06:12:50 +0000.png (648x480, 322.97K)