Worldbuilding is an art and if Tolkien is the Michelangelo of it, then Rebecca Sugar is the Rob Liefeld of it.
Worldbuilding is an art and if Tolkien is the Michelangelo of it, then Rebecca Sugar is the Rob Liefeld of it
Robert Flores
Other urls found in this thread:
Logan Thompson
>Tolkien is the Michelangelo of Worldbuilding
Want to expand on that one? Is he just an artist you know by name, and know is great, or do you have a reason to compare to the specifics of Michelangelo?
Dylan Hill
> 28 planets with mortal life
Adam Collins
>Worldbuilding is an art and if X is the Y
Hmmmmm. Confirmation biases anyone?
Nathan Howard
Why is Rob your example of a shit artist? There's way worse examples
John James
>Tolkien
Nah, HP Lovecraft is the main man.
Nathan Edwards
Pretty obviously yeah, unless he wants to call Tolkien the smelly insecure gay incel of Worldbuilding
Bentley White
That's an insult to Rob Liefeld because his work is at least modestly endearing in its gaudy excess.
Bentley Hill
I don't think so, no but explain yourself.
Dylan Rivera
He's shit compared to Michelangelo even if his style is cool
Don't tell me that is worthy of the same recognition as the Sistine Chapel ceiling
Chase Sullivan
>broly was created as a criticism of the sayans
>new movie makes sayans look good
I hate that
Parker Russell
Am I sorry, but the estrogen made me type the wrong thing. I meant Nathaniel Hawthorne
David Mitchell
Tolkien is a great worldbuilder who practically set the example for worldbuilding for future writers
Rebecca Sugar is not and her style of worldbuilding is both inadequate and inconsequential, despite some cool shit being present here and there in her worldbuilding
Parker Baker
Toriyama had dick all to do with the creation of Broli.
Lucas Reyes
I thought broly was more of a criticism of retards like us who wished we were the biggest baddest Super Saiyan as kids.
The Saiyans are still shits in the new movie, they're pissed that instead of keeping the stolen planets for themselves, they have to hand them over.
Zachary Phillips
I understood that this was a Tolkien is good, Sugar is bad syllogism. I'm saying, why Michelangelo and not Bosch or something?
And as someone above said, why Liefield? Anything specific about that comparison other than you think he's bad in some generic way?
Joseph Gray
>why Liefield
Liefeld is style over substance, just like Rebecca. Cool shit here and there, but pretty messy overall.
Dylan Green
Worldbuilding doesn't have to be this super complex thing where everything was planned out since the fucking stone age. Her worldbuilding was simple enough to get the point across to a bunch of teenagers
Tyler Reyes
Isn’t she a pedophile who drew Ed edd and eddy porn
Easton Morris
Broly was the idea that just because something is legendary that doesn't mean is good
Jayden Murphy
she did when she was like 13, hormones are weird
Zachary Cook
For once, OP is based.
Jose Ross
Broly was created to showcase what the legendary super sayan is. he is the sayan ideal. soulless killing machine
Jeremiah Watson
Well now, to be fair, she did it in spite of them being kids not because. Let's not throw around "pedophile" as it's reserved for based men and women only.
Ryder Turner
OP here, I actually like Rob Liefeld a lot as a person and think he's based.
youtu.be
Lmao at all the nerds who cope and seethe at him.
Colton Martin
>Sugar is Rob Liefeld
Then who is Nefcy supposed to be?
Eli Gonzalez
It is based on the original description of the Saiyans. Throughout the sayan-frieza saga he explained the lore of the sayans
Even broly's necklace was something he used later in the battle of gods