Which one was more creative/innovative?
Which one was more creative/innovative?
Other urls found in this thread:
ultrasound.bandcamp.com
twitter.com
The Super Furry Animals
>is one of the most persistent musicians of our times
>did generic dadrock for a couple years
hmm
Blur because ripping off Kinks and Small Faces is more creative than ripping off Rolling Stones and Who,
Suede
Well Oasis is infinitely more famous so I’m gonna with them
By far the worst era of British music
Supergrass
Blur obviously. Even the Happy Mondays were more innovative than Oasis.
Neither one was innovative or particularly creative but oasis made better music
waysis. check em
The Blur guys are clearly the better musicians, but those first two Oasis albums still kick the asses of almost anything anybody released in the '90s, including Blur at their peaks.
Don't let the "Wonderwall" meme wall you. If you haven't listened to their first two studio albums all the way through, your opinions on Oasis are worthless.
/thread
The Asphalt World is better than any song Blur or Oasis ever made.
At least you're not a Pulpfag
>Pulpfag
Now THESE were the chameleons of rock: It - they want to sound like Nick Cave, Separations - somewhere between Smiths and New Order, His 'n Hers - WTF is this Duran Duran clone? Different Class - Pulp goes Britpop, This Is Hardcore - sorry, Jarvis, you're not Bryan Ferry.
The only Britpop album in my collection ultrasound.bandcamp.com
>band that made an (albiet shitty) shoegaze album, 3 britpop albums, 2 alternative rock albums and whatever the hell think tank is
vs
>band that made the same album over and over again
>an (albiet shitty) shoegaze album
Sorry, Leisure is your aberage Baggy/Madchester album.
Definitely Maybe is a better shoegaze album than Leisure
>trend hopping slummers vs. derivative pub rock
Noel Gallagher is an underrated guitarist. You cannot change my mind
they both fucking suck. awful music that only bongoloids care about