Any objections?

The Who and The Doors should be in S tier for one

That's not bad, actually
there are a few in B that I'd move to C and C to D, but functionally it doesn't matter that much

Attached: 1654530831507.jpg (1170x1259, 542.86K)

You overrate Sabbath, Floyd, Crimson, Zeppelin, The Doors, Genesis and Yes and underrated The Stones and The Who.

Stones are right where they deserve tbdesu, everything else is fine or should even be raised

The Who are too inconsistent

open.spotify.com/playlist/0ub3qjyERQMFQmHBNmT4EF?si=712900bbcc784e75

( Still need to add Qadrophenia as well )

>Sabbath, Floyd, Crimson, Zeppelin, The Doors, Genesis and Yes
If you think these bands or any of the other bands in B-tier are better than the Stones other than The Beach Boys and The Who, you've lost the plot.
In their original form, they made 8 studio albums, 1 live album, 1 definitive singles collection and 1 collections album, and all are great. How they're less consistent than a band like Sabbath or Pink Floyd, or pretty much any band you have in front of them sans The Beatles is asinine.

Maybe not Crimson or Genesis admittedly. Say this as a prog fan as well

The only one that I can't respect, is Styx being at the bottom. Every other one is close to be accurately ranked where I would say anything, but Styx is on the complete opposite of the spectrum.

The Rolling Stones are unironically awful.

Ohh look, the bloody cool kids decided to join the chat.

Attached: 7846192847123412.jpg (888x1194, 859.62K)

what the hell has happened to this website

I look like that.