Band has only live releases

>band has only live releases

Attached: confusedmisterkrabs.jpg (600x600, 55.82K)

>debut album is a live album

Attached: 1616194449643.jpg (908x758, 317.49K)

>random live track in the middle of a studio album

Attached: 1497451406602.png (413x414, 149.4K)

>band inserts crowd noises into the tracks to make it sound like a live album

Attached: mfw-practice.jpg (1274x668, 119.08K)

Ringo's All Starr Band

>random studio track in the middle of a live album

Attached: EW-j64XWAAsqpLD.jpg (640x480, 173.68K)

band's only popular album is a live album

Attached: 1619384983781m.jpg (1024x921, 43K)

Snarky Puppy?

That one's actually not too shameful

>band's entire discography is remixes (made by other people)

Attached: flat.jpg (400x400, 16K)

>live album is actually a studio album

Attached: 1639147209155.png (658x543, 605.65K)

Is this a bad thing? I was planning on doing this cuz it seemed to be the purist way to introduce ourselves.

>studio album
>album ends with applause

Attached: Untitled.png (828x852, 916.34K)

>More live albums then studio albums
The Fall BTW look at there spotify discography

>see band live
>"this one's off our new album"
but i came here for live music

Attached: Untitled.png (436x338, 64.26K)

>band lied and said their live releases were recorded 20 years earlier than they actually were and normies believe them and hail them revolutionary

1990 makes it work

>band's only releases are bootlegs

Attached: ghost2.jpg (980x653, 40.32K)

>live album is just stage banter with no music

Attached: 3ae.png (644x944, 652.5K)

>band's entire discography is studio chatter with none of the actual music
>they've never played any live shows either

>band releases remasters that contain 40 different demos of the same song

Attached: D884B279-B212-47FB-A438-A44D71A05100.jpg (620x799, 110.44K)