The ultimate debate. who was better?

Paul >>>>>> John >>> George = Ringo

>says the martin fag

The Beatles don't exist with just one, and in fact, there's no one you can skip. John led the group early on and Paul led toward the last quarter. There's nothing on the planet like hearing them sing together. Greatest duo vocalists of all time.

paul wasx not over john asshole. this is the perspective of some music review nerd motherfucker. anyone who still had feeling in their body knows john is better

your opinion of what ability is is clouded by your slavishness to convention you whore

The only thing John has over Paul is edge-factor.

Objectively
Paul > John > Ringo > George

his melodies are more interesting

>objective
sure fag

Hahaha

good to know you took 15 secs to reply with a shit response cos you know you are wrong

its only edgy music journalists who say paul is better. john is obviously the one whos doing something interesting. paul is the nerd.

He stopped doing interesting shit after Revolver and in the later albums his only good song was Because. He is better than Paul though

yea my point is hes better than paul. he repeated melodies i guess thats what you're referring to which is lame but all i wanna know is if he didnt get shot by that fat fuck loser what music he would make

george is a one trick pony in my book
most of his songs are just a descending line cliche