Why aren't you using a 4K tv set at 96dpi as a computer monitor, Any Forums?

Why aren't you using a 4K tv set at 96dpi as a computer monitor, Any Forums?

It's literally like having 4 1080p monitors side by side, and even at massive sizes like 55 and 65 inches, it's still cheaper than a quad monitor setup, you don't need VESA mounts either.

Attached: Macbook-connected-to-samsung-frame-tv-840w-472h.jpg (840x472, 112.71K)

Forgot to add, you can also think of it as 2 ultrawide monitors stacked on top of each other.

>96dpi

Going back down to 96/72 dpi and looking at that awful text rendering is eye torture.

TVs are NOT the same as monitors

Higher dpi text looks blurry on windows

I've been using a 42.5" 4k 60hz IPS panel for 5 or 6 years now. 2nd minitor is a 27" 1440p 144hz VA panel.
Both have similar pixel density, so moving windows between the two is mostly seamless.

>windows

Attached: scoff.gif (286x204, 836.5K)

>macOS
Based

I use it at 150% scaling. OLED subpixel size isn't the best so I sit two feet further away than with a monitor.

I'm poor. That's what's stopping me.

Attached: 1658482223213719.jpg (497x754, 65K)

bump

That looks gay as fuck.

Because I already have 4 monitors that cost pocket change

A 4K monitor has less horizontal pixels than two 2k monitors even with one in landscape, I’d rather work horizontally than be looking up and down all the time which is a drag.

why not just get an 8k monitor?
I couldn't find an ATI card that could push that res for shit :(

I use mactype on Windows and it's nice

Attached: file.png (1920x1080, 503.13K)

>2k
where are you finding these 2048x1080 monitors

Because I'm using a CRT monitor.

haha. fag

because I live in a small apartment and anything over 24" would take up too much space
I'm also not a consoomer like you

1440p or 2560x1440 displays are often colloquially called 2k my dear pedant as I'm sure you were already well aware, thanks for the you.