What's stopping you from rejecting 16:9, 21:9, 32:9 and going back to 4:3?
What's stopping you from rejecting 16:9, 21:9, 32:9 and going back to 4:3?
I've already taken the 5:4 pill
I want to see more shit on my screen, not less
i already had 5:4
I'm not white
You're still looking only at 1/9th of screen at a time
eyes move faster than mouse
a 16:9 screen is just 2 8:9 screens side-by-side, I accept the compromise
It's shit
That's what's stopping me
16:10 is better
They don't make them at affordable prices and they aren't available at common places. I'd prefer a 3:2 or a √2:1 screen, however.
can't find any that are 100hz or higher
i only use 1:1 monitors. other aspect ratios are imperfect and overrated.
there are hardly any monitors being made with 4:3 AR, i'd go back if they were readily available
I don't know. I have a few 16x12 Dells around here somewhere, but haven't used them in quite awhile (preferring my LG CX).
The human eye can't see above 5:4
Nothing
my laptop is 16:9 and I have no reason to replace it with something different
For me, it's 16:10 on an 8 inch tablet.
I like 16:10.
for the same amount of physical screen real estate, it would be significantly more vertical. our feild of vision is horizontal, 16:9 is the perfect ratio (or as close as weve gotten so far) for this.
gaming, watching movies/shows, are better on 16:9.
coding, too is better as you can have longer lines without scrolling, or two windows (or more) of shorter lines. 4:3 gives you barely half of a 16:9 screen's space for viewing code on, let alone trying to do two windows side by side. and if youre gonna get a second monitor, why not just use a single 16:9?
I don't really see the advantage. 16x9 is just the standard, so I go with it
Honestly this. I just go with whatever other shit supports. There are some use cases for other aspect ratios, but generally 16:9 is compatible with everything and will give you the most pixels and monitor options for the least cost.