Criticize this language without mentioning trannies

Has a manifesto
Languages should just be useful and a joy to write in. Every line of rust has a little bit of extra hassle because you need to follow the manifesto

it's not C

Not used by Sega ergo useless to me.

Slow as fuck compiler that takes a shitload of resources in 2022 where the advocates just say "don't compile on the target machine!" when the machine has "low" memory of 2GB causing simple project builds to panic.

To hard for m... i mean muh trannies.

It's not that bad actually.
I'm rewriting few personal projects to learn more.

Claims safety but code written in Rust is usually not safe because it's a pain in the ass to write actually safe Rust (if you're doing anything meaningful)
you get the same result with a functioning brain and C
from this you can also see why trannies would rather use Rust

No non-exclusive mutable references = broken by design.
Cargo is insecure by design. Did you audit any one of the 50,000 dependencies that got pulled in by the 3 dependencies in your cargo.toml? I doubt it.
Speaking of cargo dependencies, fragmentation hell. Imagine looking at npm and thinking, "gee I wish my programming language's ecosystem was this retarded."

Attached: 51236128323.png (501x500, 74K)

>It's a toy language larping as a systems language.
>awful syntax.
>awful userbase shills too hard and desperately

Even safe Rust isn't safe. See also, rustc miscompilations.

> No non-exclusive mutable references
Thats by design to stop data races. If you REALLY need to do it just cast a shared reference to a pointer and dereference it to assign a value