Sans CDN as well.
Why does JPEG load quicker than PNG?
Sebastian Mitchell
Anthony Phillips
Because it’s smaller.
Tyler Parker
jpeg is lossy, png is lossless
Parker Barnes
It is called compression. Even though it is the same image, in one case it is bigger than the other.
For example, you know how when you see a good looking man, your dick gets bigger and harder, but when a woman starts talking to you for help with her homework, it starts to shrink until is goes inwards? Well, it is the same principle. The same cock can have different sizes.
Brody Hill
jpeg is smaller, and the time to decompress is negligible
Levi Nelson
>Why does JPEG load quicker than PNG?
Nathaniel Rodriguez
JPEG is physically smaller, and it accomplishes this by taking advantage of human deficiencies in visual perception.
For example, there's no use in displaying detail that people don't really notice, so it gets thrown out to make the file size smaller.
There's a concise video on how much of an engineering marvel the JPEG format is, but it would probably go over your head.
Jonathan Lee
It doesn't. For most images the difference is negligible, for large images there maybe a difference (jpeg will be faster).
Chase Richardson
When jpeg first came out, it would practically take minutes to render compared to gif. One image viewer of the day (qpeg) tackled that with lookup tables.
Anthony Walker
You need to be more specific. Do you mean it loads quicker as in it downloads faster or that it renders faster?
Aiden Thomas
>qpeg
that's a blast from the past
Cooper Murphy
Hardware accelerated decoding and most websites use the most compression possible before the image becomes a deep fried meme. That's why you can come across high res 8MP+ images that load instantly even on budget smartphones. PNGs on the other hand are decoded by the CPU alone and due to the nature of lossless encoding you can't really compress images all that much which puts a lot of strain on the CPU most evident on low end computer/phones.
David Baker
file size? unless the png is fully optimized to a min. file size like transparent emoticons/icons used in Symbian/Desktop IM apps back in the days
Aiden Clark
get the fuck off Any Forums mouthbreather
Chase Moore
upload a lossless jpeg here, smartpants
Hudson Lee
What the misinformed author is referring to are filters and all filters (Sub, Up, Average, Paeth and None) are strictly lossless. Their purpose is to aid compression and every scanline within a PNG image begins with a filter-type byte so no "guessing" takes place. Do your own research instead of searching for retarded blogposts to try and prove someone wrong
Andrew Kelly
Brayden Morales
>they don't have a quick action set up in the context menu to instantly convert 90% of the images they save to 95% JPEG to save space as well as improve opening speed
ngmi
Carson Rivera
jakearchibald.com
Still using JPEG instead of AVIF which saves a ton more space
Grayson Phillips
>can't upload the file anywhere
ok
Landon Miller
Not anyone's fault that Any Forums that used to adopt newest technology like webm in years past is dying under Hiroshima Nagasaki's management that refuses to add new features to the website