Does this sound right?

That seems like a lot of calories for a brisk walk.

Attached: Screenshot_20220130-200200~3.png (720x798, 288.6K)

I AM INSIDE YOUR WALLS

They say that you burn approximately 100 calories for every mile you walk. This would mean you burned about 400, but that still sounds like a lot to me. 1384 is just not possible. If it were possible to burn that many calories just by walking for an hour, everyone would do it and no one would be fat.

Is this a known problem with Strava?

If you're like 550lbs and walking continuously up hill, sure.

No, it is not right. Most people don't even burn that much running for an hour.

>walk
I'm not familiar with this term, is this some EU shit?

it's probably real calories and not """food""" calories

It might be mixing basal metabolic rate along with actual burnt calories.
An hour walk travelling 2.5 miles for me is about 200kcal

Yeah plugging numbers in for an average male into a walking calorie calculator gets just sub 400. This would mean that OP is either massive or strava is fucking up

No way
Not unless you're carrying a heavy bag and even then

...

.

>i need attention

>or strava is fucking up
I wonder if it's taking somekind of screwed up average.

Attached: Screenshot_20220130-230503.png (720x1520, 88.02K)

>Brisk walk
>1300 calories burned in an hour

Just fucking lmao
If this was even close to reality I would be 0% bodyfat walking nonstop for 10h a day on a 2500 calories diet.

How to say that you are fucking obese without saying you are obese

I clocked in barely those calories last Sunday, after a 2 hour 20km run, and I'm 210lbs, your shit is way off

6km brisk walk around 8-9min/km is 400kcal as evaluated on my garmin.
I’m 183cm@73kg.
For a few months now I’ve been doing comparison between estimated weight change (garmins estimation - MFP log) and real weight gain (measured everyday and averaged over week).
When I was cutting discrepancy was on average around 140kcal/day too high, probably because of less NEAT that was not predicted by garmin (it has static RMR calculation). On bulk that started with january, so this month, discrepancy is only 40kcal/day too low.
So I think that provided calories burned by garmin are as accurate as you can get and it should be around 400 or more if you’re fat or out of shape.

Attached: 907D16ED-E77C-4F9C-94BC-579A738AEF31.jpg (1242x1102, 370.46K)

The rule is
>60cal per km
>100cal per mi
+/- 10 or 12% based on your heart rate during exercise.
The harder thing to quantify is how much does a weightlifting workout burn

Attached: 1643580742515.jpg (1061x1061, 52.2K)

What was your average HR?