Discuss

Checked. Though we will see, these fags are running out of time.

Attached: jFujJQ_9plkKfyVoq6w8_Cr3qwj76DIDlMHeql8oMuY.jpg (640x1445, 109.46K)

Nobody announces partnerships with their middleware. No enterprise announces they will be using RabbitMQ or JBoss. They will announce products and services that have Chainlink in the stack, but it's unlikely anybody is going to announce a 'partnership' with Chainlink in the way you might be waiting for.

Attached: golfers.png (512x512, 263.75K)

More like
>why are losers so self absorbed that they think the winners amongst the masses are bad guys

Attached: 1621484052016.jpg (1274x2049, 163.79K)

28th.. a Saturnian number. Can't believe I missed that before.

true if big

>Discuss
Any Forums is tired of "discussing" chainlink.

Some people are anti-chainlink, and they don't care about the project.
Some people have already sold, and they no longer care.
Some people are swinging every pump and dip, and they just care about the price, not the project.
And the rest of us who do care are too tired to keep "discussing" ... we're just holding and waiting to see what'll happen.

There's nothing left to discuss.

>T. Holds a shitcoin that doesn’t actually do anything and doesn’t like LINK because he’s too stupid to understand the technology behind it

>ssl/https technology powers entire web infra by allowing encryption of traffic from client to server. However, no one is making a cent from it except CAs which make couple of dollars per year
Good tech!=high price

This. Icp fags have the same lack of awareness

>emerging, research

HAHAHAHAHA. Ten more years marines!!!!

>(...) and projects set to kickstart a new wave of adoption
Yes, 10 years of bullrun, starting TONIGHT.

norm was a pretty smart guy