Are women naturally more liberal than men or do they just follow the status quo?

Are women naturally more liberal than men or do they just follow the status quo?

Attached: 1657721172823.jpg (1402x2965, 879.88K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/Dq8JuyXznjA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

OP is a MGTOW D&C kike.

Attached: race dating.jpg (1689x792, 318.23K)

Their process of thought is through emotion

The only two demos Trump won. If only white women had voted, Biden would had been BTFO 327 to 211.

Attached: the only 2 demos trump won.jpg (571x865, 158.96K)

Women are naturally stupid and love doing anything that gives them attention and makes them feel good about themselves, so of course they are liberal.

Attached: 1601301832392s.jpg (250x239, 8.77K)

Just look what our societies looked like before women had the ability to vote, and after they gained the ability to vote.

No but also yes, women are more emotional, liberalism is based entirely on emotion, not reason. During the 2015 EU migrant crisis mainstream media sometimes showed dead brown kids, they even staged dead brown kids. The goal was to make women, 50% of voters, emotional and support an influx of about 8 million illegal immigrants, it worked. This video for example, refugees, at the request of a camera crew, are holding a child over a fire to make it cry. The goal is to show a crying child to women watching TV and appeal to emotion. This results in liberal policy

youtu.be/Dq8JuyXznjA

>love doing anything that gives them attention
Like faggots, am I right?

This is the best post on this thread so far.

Attached: 1663262913918939.jpg (960x639, 76.37K)

Women are inherently conservative. All woman inherently want children right? Raising children for the entirety of human fucking history has been a conservative process. Just because women are fatherless hoes NOW doesn't mean they're all liberal.

Attached: 1662820245355403.gif (236x259, 23.17K)

Attached: 1661095539198378.png (1520x1190, 121.55K)

she was always ugly you just grew up seeing her

naturally more in need of social validation

Women are revolted by hate. Men can into hate, but it’s not healthy. It’s something they can shoulder, but it will destroy them eventually. The right communicates it’s hate with a bullhorn, scaring women away. The left os much more willing to lie and deceive, as they lack morals, so their cooing attracts women. If they ever want to go right, the left points them to Any Forums, and say that’s who you will be associated with. That’s why this board exists.

They have liberal tendencies.
But their strongest tendency is following the lead of the majority.
Today they're liberal.
Put them in nazi germany and they love hitler.

>in need of social validation
Basically this. It's probably genetic memory or something since back in the day if they didn't follow the tribe they would be fucked. So now they socially engineer the tribe so get women to do retarded shit.
>"life is bout experiences and seeing the world"
>spends all her money on traveling

liberalism revolves around emotional appeals, and emotional appeals work very well with women. that's about all there is to it

>Are women naturally more liberal than men
Yes.

>or do they just follow the status quo?
They use the "status quo" as a "they do it too/everyone does it" reason to keep on pushing the lelbruhl retardation.

Women always were following the "status quo" or to put it in more modern terms "the popular thing"

It happened in Germany with Nazis, where some of the most hardcore nazis were women, just because Nazi politics was "the thing" back then.

It happened with communism, same story, it was "the thing to support".

Basically whatever you put into newspapers/media as the "current thing" women are always the first to latch on and often become "ride or die" with it.

While men often sought idea to rally behind, be it personified idea or just in general. Women rally behind
the popular "thing".

You can even see it in microcosm when woman hangs around guys that are into some ideology, the woman will be conforming to their views the most.
Be it hating fags, loving niggers whichever. The content doesnt matter, the popularity in group matters. Nowadays with media having the insane penetration
they enjoy, its easier to sway women to the "thing" than ever before.


Who knows why it is how it is. Maybe they are just drawn to the power and strength of the new popular movement just to secure themselves.

my 2 cents i guess.

shut he fuck up faggot

they are more liberal cause they are weak af. they cannot survive without men or handouts. and they have a biological clock. They are literally a slave gender. they are grouped with the mentally handicapped and children, so what do you think, OP?

They follow the status quo.
Women are meant to be guided.
When their immediate surroundings stop doing that, they'll take their lessons from social media and pop culture.

Attached: 1507230739877.jpg (1024x937, 68.59K)

They want to be taken care of by daddy (government)

Daddy gubment takes great care of me and my 4 nigglets (;

Mgtow life is comfy. Any diversity of thought on Any Forums is from the kikes.

>yas dont have to put up with talking
imagine being with that thing though, walking around, never making a sound

Women follow, period. Whether their parents, their husband, their family, their friends, their social media, the mainstream media or the federal government. Women are to be lead, they need leadership, they look to big brother if necessary or validation from their peers. No woman has EVER truly walked alone. They are sheep, every single one of them and always looking for a better shepherd.

I know top ladies and even the best ones want to be led by a man. Without that, they go nuts.

Women follow who they perceive is the winning group. The media can distort who is the more powerful group and that is why propaganda is so much more effective against women.

imagine how fun it would be to tame & feed her. and breed her.

>fart whisperer

They can be only if they’re religious

> The literature on the voting behaviour of women during the late Weimar period also points to Protestant piety as a possible linchpin in the Nazi vote. Scholars have long maintained that women retained greater rates of piety than men, going so far as to cast the 'feminization of religion' as one of the most important transformations in modern European cultural life. And again, as with class, geography and region, we see a direct correlation between Protestant piety and tendency to vote Nazi. According to Jill Stephenson, some major points concerning women's voting behaviour in Germany after I918 are generally agreed upon. First,women voted far more strongly than men for clerical/conservative parties, 'with the accent on clerical'. Childers also points out that Protestant women in Weimar Germany were more inclined than men to vote for parties emphasizing religious themes. In Protestant areas the DNVP and specifically evangelical interest groups, like the Christlich-Sozialer Volksdienst, benefited from this.

> second, after 1930, the percentage of women in the Nazi vote rose sharply. Childers argues that in 1932, especially, the party made enormous gains among Protestant women, to the extent that women outnumbered men in the Nazi constituency for the first time (at least in those areas where votes were tabulated by sex). Falter is more qualified in his analysis,demonstrating that women outnumbered men in the 1932 Nazi constituency only in Protestant towns with populations under 2000 - where religiosity was generally higher.

They do whatever is socially acceptable