Has having an ugly, desensitized cock due to circumcision affected your sexuality, user?

Has having an ugly, desensitized cock due to circumcision affected your sexuality, user?

Attached: banana.jpg (1024x789, 60.63K)

Sometimes I cum fast but sometimes I take very long to cum. I’ve gotten it under control though so now I can cum on cue like a pornstar. It helps that I’m very pretty

Nope

Three same numbers!
Cumming fast is a product of being uncut though. Being cut means you last longer and feel less sensation during sex. Unless it's a sissygasm I suppose.

not every cut is the same

yes, yes it has. its also in the past made me bitter and angry enough to try restoration, my dick looks weird made me too insecure to approach girls, hurts to use it really difficult to cum so now I'm a fag bottom all according to plan i presume.

Reminder that all "don't you hate your disgusting fucked up circumcised penis?" posts like these are made by weird self-hating incels who blame their inability to have sex on being circumcised.

From what I’ve heard being uncut just makes you feel pleasure normal and being cut makes your nerves all confused, which matches my experience. Not a bottom though.

Every cut removes the prepuce and at least part -if not all- of the frenulum, making sexual gratification decreased.

I think it's something more akin to an SPH fetish, they clearly get off on degrading themselves

>Every cut removes the prepuce and at least part -if not all- of the frenulum
nope, depends on the hospital

Plus cut cocks are hotter. Who wants a man with some smooth feminine cockhead? Mines 8” and rough so I wouldn’t have it any other way

I bet America and Canada are so accepting of trannyism only because their cocks were already mutilated by shlomos

snipchan comes to mind

I'm uncut and could fuck for hours before hrt

I just cut the rest of it off and got a vagina so I wouldn’t have to worry about shit like this

That's hot

Attached: 02a.jpg (335x270, 19.12K)

It's also funny that the only girls I know who have any opinion say they think uncircumcised is gross and would reject a guy for it.
Probably a girl thing, and why cut guys are less likely to be gay statistically.

Attached: foreskin.jpg (457x614, 103.14K)

>why cut guys are less likely to be gay statistically
Practically everyone I meet on Grindr has the mutilation treatment. I need some stats pronto if you're not on copium.

fuck you OP.
im uncut and now i have phimosis and it hurts to cum BEING UNCUT RUINED MY LIFE

hey just be glad you're uncut or else you'd probably be straight.
imagine unironically being a breeder.

i hate you

>couldn't even pull the damned foreskin down at first it was stuck, glued fast to the cheese clay crust in there

That is so fucking hot it's unbelievable.

Attached: pegi18.jpg (295x360, 19.36K)

I had phimosis and fixed it myself you're just a kike

I'm circumcised

sure, hun

Just do what snipchan does and pathologize your inferiorness. Make it a fetish.

Attached: potatobro.jpg (650x873, 73.64K)

/r/cuthumiliation is that way ==>

Weird because every time I see femboy / trap / twink porn, the bottom is invariably uncircumcised. Can someone explain?

I agree. Get some steroid cream and stretch. You'll have a good peepee in two months. Unsure how it gets so bad it hurts though.

>Three same numbers!
Am I even on Any Forums

Gays are more likely to be uncircumcised.
Historically it was used to prevent gay urges, with success.

I swear to god he said ‘same there numbers’
Am I dyslexic?

i dont see how thats possible. I've already flipped it around the other way and fetishized uncut dicks

Almost as if kikes make most porn or something

Women don't have souls, can't think properly. American women dislike foreskin because they're. American.

Having a mutilated dick , you see all dicks as disgusting pathetic mutilated things so you can never develop an attraction to them.

And since bottoms are women, bottoms also don't have souls.

It seems more fitting that an inferior sissy slut with a circumcision (traditionally done to slaves) would only be able to achieve sexual satisfaction through being fucked in the ass. That makes the most sense to me.

Attached: snipchan.png (203x193, 52.41K)

No, you're lysdexic.

Unfortunately it's the opposite, historically it was used to prevent gay urges.

Sounds like cut copium. I'd be interested in seeing one (1) source. The closest thing I can think to this is circumcision being used as an attempt to curb masturbation. Which is very much different.

>yes, yes it has. its also in the past made me bitter and angry enough to try restoration, my dick looks weird made me too insecure to approach girls, hurts to use it really difficult to cum so now I'm a fag bottom all according to plan i presume.
if it's the Jews' plan to make you and everyone like you a gay bottom, why do they also circumcise all of their own sons? how does that logic work?

made me hate my dick for as long as I can remember

i dont know, i just need someone or something to channel my anger at.

Because Jews are not the arbiters of circumcision, they just adopted it. Your brain is on mass copium if you think ""They"" have this grandiose plan to subjugate the modern male with the ritual they appropriated centuries after it was invented.

In truth, Christians and Muslims alike have adored circumcision. Circumcision as Americans know it was introduced by a Baptist by the name of Kellogg. Yes, that Kellogg. The cereal inventor.