What are some uncomfortable truths about cinema?

What are some uncomfortable truths about cinema?

Attached: 1643153824848.jpg (553x555, 28.6K)

Any movie over 2 hours long isn't worth seeing

Any movie under 2 hours long isn't worth seeing

famous actors ruin original IP creation more than studios because they charge way too much to act

It lacks intellectual content.

That it is entirely inferior to literature. Even a second tier classic novel has more going on than a "masterpiece" of film

Any movie exactly 2 hours long isn't worth seeing

Motion pictures were created with the sole purpose of spreading perversion and destroying the values of western nations.

Unconfortable to who? Any Forums?
Zendaya is a good actress. Most old movies are bad or below average.

Yet poetry is superior to most novels in terms of its ability to convey more with less.

Regardless, it's not the medium but the artist that counts.

90% of the child actors you liked growing up were routinely raped and molested.

visionaries like malick would never have gotten their projects funded if not for the star power attached to it

What values? In Latino countries it didn't change nothing. Family still our main goal and we care about it.
You mean EU and USA? Then yes. And get fucked mutts. It's satisfying seeing your country downfall.

It's all subjective and nobody can prove otherwise

One isn’t better than the other. You’re autistic and basically comparing a race car to a gaming computer.

Poetry is the height of purple prose and should be disregarded by all serious scholars

The business model kneecapped and doomed it as an artform from the beginning.

That's kinda hot

This. Triggered anons appearing in 5 seconds.

directors are irrelevant, dps and editors make or break a picture

Both are inferior to vidya. Film has already been replaced as the dominant art form and in a few decades it will be reduced to the same pathetic state as literature.

Well everyone knows this user. Not a comfortable truth but an accepted one.

That's all art forms desu

>Purple prose
Shelley and Eliot evoke greater emotion with less "flowery descriptions" than any novelist you can point to. While it's true some poets fail at poetry by leaning too far into purple prose - the masters never did. And the works of those masters eclipse anything else in the Western Canon.

Attached: eliot.jpg (1245x1400, 208.66K)

one example of a film that was unanimously considered better than its literary counterpart disproves your thesis entirely

Whites have made better movies than Jews

Considering that most jewish movies are muh holocaust and shitty musical comedies I agree

Attached: 000t.jpg (1280x720, 150.75K)

Argumentum ad numerum.

frfr no cap

retarded manchild

HOLLYWOODS FULL OF JEWS

It was entirely rooted in mass mind control and therefore it should be fundamentally questionable as an art form

based

Attached: 8qhfiunpv8c21.png (881x1024, 228.76K)

You like the movies that are marketed to you.
You don't actually have your own taste, your taste can be reduced to an archetype.

Attached: 1638309737669.png (149x117, 23.33K)

Only monster movies and art films are worth watching.

Dps know techniques and understand the limitations of the cameras and lens used but they're generally just doing things based on what the director wants basically. Same guy who shot Raging Bull shot Space Jam, after all.

The editor is, again, generally just doing things based on what the director wants.

That this list is accurate

Attached: 1634755023330.jpg (1872x4864, 3.56M)

Disney ruined cinema

Good list but there's no Movie 43

It's mostly jews

99% of it is shit

not enough adam sandler movies

So basically the job of the director is to...direct.

Ghostbusters should haven't become a franchise.

The actors skin color doesnt matter. A black or asian person that is good in acting should be allowed to play a historic white character

People who shit on films to appear cultured are awful larpers. Yeah people who actually write great literature like DFW, Hemingway enjoy films and engage with them as art but you user on Any Forums know better than DFW and Hemingway, you've concluded the truth that cinema is not art, it's a passive meduim with 0 intellectual merit just like music, a tool to enslave the masses, you are a true thinker and a genius.

Attached: licensed-image.jpg (1383x2048, 294.09K)

Cinema is dying and everything will be online in 10 years time

Apocalypse now

only Jews can make good movies

Eliot is confusing and difficult and no one likes him. Ironically he hated Shelley too