Questionable Content

Terrible

Attached: 4714.png (800x1160, 429.41K)

You do that
you share stuff you don't like on Any Forums?

you do that
you post in threads you don't like on Any Forums?

No. I usually hide them outright.

can a unit of one unionize on its own? isnt it just negotiating its own employment at that point?

How long til J realizes the conundrum?

Or is he wilful stupid about what a work union is?

Just one coronal mass ejection could fix all this AI nonsense.

Right, if the assembly line is all one AI, then it is already effectively a union.

JJ trying to tap into current antiwork sentiment and doing it poorly.

then do that and fuck off

It seems like a job related housing issue. Especially if it's actually several AI living in the assembly line digital bunkhouse (the pronoun use make it hard to discern).

>lets make the government slave owners by default
marx never makes sense past the initial dopamine.

Ivory Tower Jeph and his 5 digit patreon income strikes again

No. I like this thread.

>dopamine hit

Why is he making a comic about hispters in Massachusetts when the whole world about robots is much more interesting? Just make a slice of life about robots.

Champagne Socialists don't actually understand the working class, the working poor, and the poor. They just have their approved mouth noises they make in order to gain the approval of their fans. The refreshing thing about Yerf is that he's so bad at it you can't help but laugh at it. He's not even offensive, he's so far gone he's a one-man show.

Setting aside the issue of whether or not a single entity can unionize, exactly what the fuck is it unionizing over?

Do it

Attached: FuckingDoit.png (243x264, 66.13K)

Remuneration or work conditions, I'd say. Maybe it feels it doesn't get enough maintenance.

Thats a good question.
cant be, even the most greedy strawmen would have an interest in his money printer being kept in shape

Why would an Ai even care? by and large unless they use a body they dont need jobs.
Oh right, the writer is shit

it probably didnt matter in the inception of this comic because union good and union busting bad.

>>lets make the government slave owners by default

you mean the company, right? the employer in the comic isnt the govt

Better vote in another union busting silver spoon grifter just to make those slightly wealthier than median liberals mad! Never mind that our children will get to choose in-between being ground into disability for poverty wages or being whored out to the military just to end up the same fucking way. If they don't end up in a box.

How fucking dare those people care about somone outside of their own income bracket. Hypocrites.

In the hand of a competent writer, this would be interesting. Workers right are a thing, so should sentient beings that aren't human have them? In this case we have a robot that not olnly did seize the means of production, but IS the mean of production. All this can be used to write intersting social dinamics and meaningful methapors.
Stabby will just fuck up, hopefully bad enough to enrage his rabid fans

>How fucking dare those people care about somone outside of their own income bracket.

if you think they give 2 shits about you, i've got a bridge on Any Forums to sell you. They care about who's in charge of the union, and how much money they can get from the dues. Thats it. You don't have to go far to find news about how union members are always pissed at their leadership for getting into politics, and supporting people they dont want.

> one robot immediately disregards the other robot apparently put a human in emotional distress and didn't mention ameliorating the situation, and puts another robots affairs above it

yes, there's no way this could end badly for the humans.

Attached: TrekDataBeep.jpg (159x219, 12.19K)

Why would he bother with any improvements?
He only cares about money and has enough devoted retards donating to him to make a comfortable living. There is no incentive for improving.

the left, not just in america but by and large across the west, is kind of in a pro-corporatism phase for whatever the fuck reason. This included staying quiet when mega-corps ignore union attempts. See microsoft, amazon, disney, their moves should have garnered outrage, but all you hear is silence. If anything more on the right are calling bullshit on them.
Since the right tend to have the small / medium business support, I guess they saw a gap to exploit? More likely they just want more control like always

>those people care

Attached: raugh.gif (320x200, 1.9M)

Be sure to buy your BLM nike shoe user. Made by the finest of chinese childslaves.

>deflect any responsibility and blame others
Cause that has worked out ever.

>all you hear is silence
No, you also hear full throated support when multinational billion dollar megacorps violate the civil rights of people they don't like. "It's not a 1st amendment issue if it's not the government censoring you," is pretty high on the list of shit I never thought I'd hear en mass from the left. That and the left calling for people to be denied healthcare have eroded much, if not all, of the respect I had for the American left.

>See microsoft, amazon, disney, their moves should have garnered outrage,

it seems like the social constructionist culture war stuff is more important to them to get implemented, even at the cost of ignoring their worker malfeasance.

>More likely they just want more control like always

dude, you can lay that at the feet of any political party. Its their fucking stated goal. it doesnt mean anything.

Its the authoritarianism they engage in that is what we should worry about. Wanting to boot the opposition out of power is fine, wanting to change rules to centralize power, or to deny access to opposition regardless of any other identity, just 'opposition'

Fuck man i forgot about their moves to deny healthcare to people for political reasons.
Even censoring doctors at this point. When will this chaotic amalgam of bullshit collapse on them already.

Yeah I meant more in the authoritarian sense like you said.
Thank God for WV and their senator blocking the bulk of that bullshit so far.

>bad copypaste
>Wanting to boot the opposition out of power is fine, wanting to change rules to centralize power, or to deny access to opposition regardless of any other identity, just 'opposition'

is what we need to be wary of and multiple times the left and right have engaged in it, with their changing views on free/dangerous speech over decades. But the left revels in it with notions of platforming by even engaging with opposition

No really, what do the bots need money for? buying different bodies?
Ai dont age, so whats to stop AI assembly bot from accumulating wealth over decades? They dont have alot of llife costs.
By this logic, in a century the bulk of money across the world would be in the "hands" of AI. Since they dont have life costs this would grind alot of the economy to a halt, really fuck over farmers which would then without help lead to shortages.

I know its been pointed out before but somehow this cunt keeps making his utopian setting more and more distopian.

>buying different bodies?
Yes. Their bodies are as maintenance heavy as any complex machinery and they have to pay for routine maintenance and, as with Mey, new chassis.

and what about working disembodied AIs? >128600758 is right, wealth would consolidate, and so fast once the game-theory behind it was laid bare to the AIs


there's all sorts of problems like this with this neat little fictitious worldbuilding that J is working on trying to make a serious go of.

What you're overlooking is that no AI in its right mind would be capitalistic.